Herramientas Personales
Usted está aquí: Inicio V - Bibliografía G - L

G - L

 
  • Ghaphery, J. (2002). My Library at Virginia Commonwealth University: Third year evaluation. D-Lib Magazine, 8(7-8).

 

  • Garland, K. (1982). Developing a scale of comprehensiveness to serve as a collection evaluation criterion. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 19, 110-112.

 

  • Gaudet, F., y Lieber, C. (2000). El expurgo en la biblioteca. Madrid: ANABAD.

 

  • Genoni, P. (2004). Content in institutional repositories: a collection management issue. Library Management, 25(6-7), 300-306.

 

  • Godden, I. P., Fachan, K. W., Smith, P. A., Brug, S. (Comps). (1982). Collection develpment and acquisitions, 1970-1980: an annotated critical bibliography. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press.
 
  • Golden, B. (1974). A method for quantitatively evaluating a university library collection. Library Resources & Technical Services, 18, 268-274.
 
  • Gorman, G. E., y Millar, R. H. (1996). Collection management for the 21st. Century; a Handbook for Librarians. Westport, Con. London: Greenwood Press.
 
  • Gosnell, Ch. (1944). Obsolescence of books in a college library. College and Research Libraries, 4, 115-125.
 
  • Guerreiro, I. et al. (1980). Utilizacao de metodos quantitativos na availiacao de colecao. The use of quantitative methods in collection evaluation. Revista Da Escola Biblioteconomia Da UFMG,  224.
 
  • Guerrero-Bote, V. P. et al. (2002). Methods for the analysis of the uses of scientific information: the case of the University of Extremadura (1996-97). Libri, 52(2), 99-109.
 
  • Gwinn, N. E., y Mosher, P. H. (1983). Coordinating collection development: the RLG conspectus. College & Research Libraries, 44, 128-140.
 
  • Gómez, M. (2002). A Bibliometric Study to Manage a Journal Collection in an Astronomical Library: Some Results. Library and Information Services in Astronomy, 4, 214-222 .
 
  • Hamaker, C. A. (1994). Redesigning serials collections. Journal of Library Administration, 20(1), 37-47.
 
  • Hanford, P. H. (1980). Toward a theory of collection development. Collection Development in Libraries: A treatise, Part B . Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.
 
  • Harris, C. (1977). A comparison of issues and in-library use of books. Aslib Proceedings, 29, 118-126.

 

  • Haycock, L. A. (2004). Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development. Library Resources and Technical Services,  102-106.

 

  • Henderson, A. (2000). The Library Collection Failure Quotient: The Ratio of Interlibrary Borrowing to Collection Size. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(3), 159-170.
 
  • Herzog, S. (2004). Collection Development Challenges for the 21st Century Academic Librarian. The Acquisitions Librarian, 31/32, 149-162.

 

  • Hindle, A. (1979). Markov models of book obsolescence. Information Processing & Management, 15, 17-18.

 

  • Hindle, A., y Buckland, M. (1978). In library book usage in relation to circulation.  Collection Management, 2(4), 265-277.

 

  • Holleman, C. (2000). Electronic resources: or Basic Criteria for the Selection of Material Changing? Library Trends, 48(4),  694-710.

 

  • Horava, T. (2005). A New Approach to Faculty-Librarian Collaboration: A "New Professors' Fund" for Collection Development. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(5), 482-485.

 

  • Hsieh, L.-F., Chin, J.-B., y Wu, M.-C. (2006). Performance evaluation for university electronic libraries in Taiwan. Electronic Library, 24(2), 212-224.

 

  • Huamán, B. A. M. (2003). Evaluación de la colección de la Biblioteca de la Facultad de Ciencias Contables de la UNMSM de acuerdo a normas y directivas internacionales para bibliotecas universitarias. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas. EAP de Bibliotecología y Ciencias de la Información, Lima. 

 

  • Hughes, J. (1995). Use of faculty publication lists and ISI citation data to identify a core list of journals with local importance. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory,  403-413.
 
  • Ibekwe-Sanjuan, F. (2005 ). How thematic maps can assist collection management: A qualitative assessment of Joumals' thematic focus. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 29(3), 295-306.

 

  • Ifidon, S. E. (1976). Qualitative/quantitative evaluation of academic library coleections: a literature survey". International Library Review, 8, 299-308.
 
  • Jacobs, N. A. (1995). The evaluation and improvement of book availability in an academic library. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1, 41-55.

 

  • Jager, K. D. (2002). Impacts & outcomes: searching for the most elusive Indicators of academic library performance. Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services . Disponible en: http://www.libqual.org/documents/admin/dejager.pdf

 

  • Jain, A. K. (1969). Sampling and data collection methods for a book use study. Library Quarterly, 39, 245-262.

 

  • Jenkins, C., y Morley, M. (1991). Collection mangement in academic libraries. Worcester: Gower.
 
  • Jenks, G. M. (1976). Circulation and its relationship to the book collection and academic departments. College and Research Libraries, 37(145-152)

 

  • Johnson, B. (1996). Citation Analysis of the Texas Tech University's Statistics Faculty: A Study Applied to Collection Development at the University Library. LIBRES: Library and Information Science Research, 6(3).  Disponible en: http://libres.curtin.edu.au/libre6n3/johnson.htm

 

  • Johnson, H. (1998). User satisfaction surveys over 5 years: a college of higher education experience. British Library.Research and Innovation Report, (92), 23-31.

 

  • Johnson, P., y Macewan, B. (1994). Collection Management and development; issues in an electronic era. Chicago; London: American Library Association.

 

  • Johnson, P. (2004) Fundamentals of collection development and management. Chicago: American Library Association.

  

  • Jones, C. (2001). Development strategies for library collections in a digital environment. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 14(3), 101-.
 
  • Jones, Y. (2006). Oversized and Underused: Size Matters in Academic Libraries. College and Research Libraries, 67(4), 325-333.

 

  • Kantor, P. B. (1984). Objective performance measures for academic and research libraries. Washington, D. C.: Association of Research Libraries.

 

  • Kao, C., y Lin, Y.-C. (2004). Evaluation of the university libraries in Taiwan: Total measure versus ratio measure. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(12), 1256-1265.

 

  • Kent, A. et al. (1979). Use of library materials : The University of Pittsburg study. New York: Dekker.

 

  • Khorramzadeh, H. (1988). Modelos matemáticos de Morse-Markov : Su aplicación en bibliotecas, evaluación de uso de obras monográficas. México: UNAM. CUIB.

 

  • Kiger, J. E., y Wise, K. (1996). Auditing an Academic Library Book Collection. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(4), 267-272.
 
  • Klassen, T. W. (2001). Measuring serials usage using faculty cited journals data.  Bottom Line,  37-43.

 

  • Knievel, J. E. et al. (2006). Use of Circulation Statistics and Interlibrary Loan Data in Collection. College and Research Libraries, 67(1), 35-49.
 
  • Knievel, J. E., y Kellsey, C. (2005).  Citation Analysis For Collection Development: A Comparative Study Of Eight Humanities Fields. Library Quarterly, 75(2), 142-168.
 
  • Kountz, J. (1991). What’s in a library : comparing holdings to the constituencies served.  Library Hi Tech, 9(2), 31-48.
 
  • Kovacs, D. K., y Elkordy, A. (2000). Collection development in cyberspace: building an electronic library collection.  Library Hi Tech , 18(4), 335-359.
 
  • Kraemer, A. B. (2001). Evaluating usage of monographs: is it feasible and worthwhile? Collection Management,  35-46.

 

  • Krueger, K. (1983). Coordinated Cooperative Collection Development for Illinois Libraries. Springfield, Illinois State Library. 3 vols.
 
  • Labonte, K. B. (2005). Citation Analysis: A Method for Collection Development for a Rapidly Developing Field. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Summer.
 
  • Lambert, J., y Taylor, S. (1996). Evaluating a journals collection in an academic library. Serials, 9(3), 317-321.

 

  • Lancaster, F. W. (1978). Pautas para la evaluación de sistemas y servicios de información. Paris: UNESCO.

 

  • Lancaster, F. W. (1990). Has Technology Failed Us? Essen Symposium (pp. 1-13).

 

  • Lancaster, F. W. (1993). If you want to evaluate your library (2nd ed.). London: Library Association.

 

  • Lancaster, F. W. (1995). The evaluation of library services : A concise review of the existing literature. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 9(18), 25-35.
 
  • Lancaster, F. W. (1996). Evaluación de la Biblioteca. Madrid: Asociación Española de Archiveros, Bibliotecarios, Museólogos y  Documentalistas.
 
  • Lee, D. C., y Lockway, L. A. Using an online comprehensive library management system in collection development. Collection Management, 14(3-4), 61-73.
 
  • Lee, H. L. (2000). What is a collection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(12), 1107-1113.
 
  • Lee, H. L. (2003). Collection Development as a Social Process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29 (1), 23-31.
 
  • Leiding, R. (2005). Using Citation Checking of Undergraduate Honors Thesis Bibliographies to Evaluate Library Collections. 66(5), 417-429.
 
  • Lesniaski, D. (2004). Evaluating collections: a discussion and extension of Brief Tests of Collection Strength. College and Undergraduate Libraries,  11-24.
 
  • Lewis, J. S., y McDonald, J. D. (2002). Defining an undergraduate core journal collection. Serials Librarian,  45-59.

 

  • Lightman, H., y Manilov, S. (2000). A Simple Method for Evaluating a Journal Collection: A Case Study of Northwestern University Library’s Economics Collection. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16(3), 183-190.
 
  • Lindauer, B. G. (2000). Definición y medida del impacto de las bibliotecas universitarias sobre los resultados globales de la institución. Boletín De La Asociación Andaluza De Bibliotecarios, 59
 
  • Line, M. B. (2001). The use of citation and other statistics in stock management.  IFLA Journal,  247-252.
 
  • Line, M. B., y Sandison, A. (1974). Obsolescence and changes in the use of literature with time. Journal of Documentation, 30, 283-350.

 

  • Line, M. B. (1991). The concept of “library goodness”: user and library perception of quality and value. En Line, M.B. (Ed.), Academic Library Management. Chicago: American Library Association.
 
  • Littman, J. (2004). A Circulation Analysis of Print Books and E-Books in an Academic Research Library.

 

  • Liu, L. G. (2001). The contribution of library collections to prestige of academic programs of universities: a quantitative analysis. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 25, 49-65.
 
  • Lochstet, G. S. (1997). Course and Research Analysis Using a Coded Classification System. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, September, 380-389.
 
  • Lugo, J. F. (1999). Manual para el desarrollo de colecciones en bibliotecas universitarias de Venezuela y el mundo. Caracas.

 

  • Luo, C., Zhou, Z., y Zhang, Y. (2004) Building digitized collection: Theory and practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3334, 165-173.
 
  • Lumande, E., y Ojedokun, A. A. (2005). Collection mapping as an evaluation technique for determining curriculum and collection relationship: the University of Botswana Experience. African Journal of Library,  25-33.

 

 

 

Acciones de Documento