|
|
- Info
A - F
- Abad García, M. F. (2005). Evaluación de la calidad de
los sistemas de información.
Madrid: Síntesis.
- Aguilar, W. (1986). The application of relative use and ILL demand in collection development.
Collection Management, 8(1), 15-24.
- Al-Fares, H. K. (1998). Optimizing a library's loan
policy: An integer programming approach. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 49(13), 1167-1176.
- Alonso Arévalo, J., Echeverría Cubillas, M. J., y
Martín Cerro, S. (1999). La gestión de las bibliotecas universitarias:
indicadores para su evaluación. Seminario sobre Indicadores en la
universidad: información y decisiones (pp. 1-12). Disponible en: http://eprints.rclis.org/492/1/Indicadores.pdf
- Atilgan, D., y Bayram, O. G. (2006). An Evaluation of
Faculty Use of the Digital Library at Ankara University, Turkey. The Journal
of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 86-93.
- Bailey, T. P. (2006). Electronic Book Usage at a Master’s
Level I University: A Longitudinal Study. The Journal of Academic
Librarianship, 32(1), 52–59.
- Baird, B. J. (2004). Library Collection Assesment
through statistical sampling. Maryland: Scarecrow Press.
- Beheshti, J., Tague, J. M. (1984). Morse's Markov model of book use revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(5), 259-267.
- Beile, P. M. et al. (2004). A Microscope or a Mirror?: A
Question of Study Validity Regarding the Use of Dissertation Citation Analysis
for Evaluating Research Collections. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,
30(5), 347-353.
- Bergman, B. J., y Laskowski, M. S. (2004). Academic
media center collection development and circulation policies: a comparative
analysis. College and University Media Review, 85-118.
- Bevis, M. D., y Graham, J. B. (2003). The Evolution of
an Integrated Electronic Journals Collection. The Journal of Academic
Librarianship, 24 (2), 115–119.
- Biblarz, D., Bosch, S., y Sugnet, C. (2001). Guide to library user needs assessment for integrated information resource management and collection development. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.
- Blake, J. C., y Schleper, S. P. (2004). From data to
decisions: Using surveys and statistics to make collection management
decisions. Library Collections, Acquisitions,
& Technical Services, 28, 460-464.
- Bland, R. N. (1980). The college textbook as a tool for
collection evaluation, analysis, and retrospective collection development. Library
Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, 4(3-4), 193-197.
- Bodi, S., y Maier-O’Shea, K. (2005). The Library of
Babel: Making Sense of Collection Management in a Postmodern World. The
Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(2), 143-150.
- Bookstein, A.
(1975). On Morse-Chen book-use model. Library Quaterly, 45, 195-198.
- Borrego, A., y Urbano, C. (2005). Estadísticas e
indicadores de rendimiento de colecciones y servicios bibliotecarios de
carácter electrónico: estudio de caso de las revistas electrónicas. Statistics
and performance indicators for electronic library collections and services: a
case study of electronic journals. Profesional De La Informacion, 14(1),
30-38.
- Boza Puerta, M., y Olmedo Granados, G. (1998). Se
adaptan los fondos de mi biblioteca a las necesidades de los usuarios ? : Un
método objetivo de evaluación de colecciones en una biblioteca científica. VI
Jornadas Espoñolas de Documentación.
- Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific
subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.
- Britten,
W. A. (1990). A use
statistic for collection management: The 80/20 rule revisited. Library Adquisitions, 14,
183-189.
- Brooks, S. (2001). Integration of information resources
and collection development strategy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 316-319.
- Brooks, T. A., y Forys, J. W. (1986). Smoothing
forecasting methods for academic library circulations: an evaluation and
recommendation. Library and Information Science Research, 8(91), 29-39.
- Brooks, T. A. (1982). The systematic nature of
library-output statistics. Library Research, 353.
- Brooks, T. A. (1984). Using time-series regression to
predict academic library circulations. College and Research Libraries, 45(6),
501-505.
- Brownsey, K. W. R.,
y Burrell, Q. L. (1986). Library circulation distribution: some observation on
the PLR sample. Journal of Documentation, 42, 22-45.
- Buckland,
M. K. (1972). An
operations research study of a variable loan and duplication policy at the
University of Lancaster. Library Quarterly, 42, 97-106.
- Buckland, M. K., & Hindle, A. (1969). Loan policies,
duplication and availability. Planning library services (pp. 1-16). University of Lancaster Library.
- Burton, R. E., y Kebler, R. W. (1960). The “half life”
of some scientific and technical literatures. American Documentation, 11,
18-20.
- Busha, C. H., y Harter, S. P. (1990). Métodos de
investigación en Bibliotecología: Técnicas e interpretación. México: UNAM.
- Byrd, G.
D. et al. (1982). Collection
development using interlibrary loan borrowing and adquisition statistics.
Bulletin of the Medical
Library Association, 70, 1-9.
- Calenge, B. (1994). Les politiques d’acquisition;
constituer une collection dans une bibliothčque. Paris: Cercle de la
Librairie.
- Carpenter,
D., y Getz, M.
(1995). Evaluation of library
resources in the field of economics : A case study. Collection Management, 20(1-2),
49-89.
- Carrigan, D. P. (1996). Collection Development -
Evaluation. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(4), 273-278.
- Chen, C. (1976). Aplications of operations research models to
Libraries. Cambridge, Mass:
MIT Press.
- Chu, F. T. (1997). Librarian-Faculty Relations in
Collection Development. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23, 15-20.
- Crawford, J. (1996). Evaluation of Library and
Information Services. London: ASLIB.
- Cullen, R. (2006). Operationalising the Focus/Values/Purpose Matrix: A tool for libraries to measure their ability to deliver service quality. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 7(2), 83-99.
- Davis, P. M. (2002). Patterns in Electronic Journal Usage:
Challenging the Composition of Geographic Consortia. College & Research
Libraries, November.
- Davis, T. L. (1997). The Evolution of Selection Activities
for Electronic Resources. Library Trends, 45(3), 391-.
- Dennison, R. F. (2000). Quality assessment of collection
development through tiered checklists: can you prove you are a good collection
developer? Collection Building, 19(1), 24-26.
- Derfert-Wolf, L., Górski, M. M., y Marcinek, M. (2004). Management based on reliable comparative data. Library statistics and performance indicators. A common project of Polish research libraries. IATUL Proceedings, 14, 11-24.
- Dobson, C. et al. (1996). Collection evaluation for
interdisciplinary fields: a comprehensive approach. Journal of Academic
Librarianship, 22(4), 279-284.
- Dowlin, K. y Magrath, L. (1983). Beyond the numbers -a decision support system. En: Library Automation as a Source of Management Information; ed.
por F.W.Lancaster, pp.27-58. Urbana, University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
- Ebersole, W. D. (1999). Using online catalogs to evaluate
science collections for a group of institutions. Science and Technology
Libraries, 105-113.
- Egghe, L., y Goovaerts, M. (2006). A note on measuring
overlap . Journal of Information Science.
- Enright, B. et al. (1989). Selection for survival : a
review of acquisition and retention policies. London: The British Library.
- Enssle, H. R., y
Wilde, M. L. (2002). So you have to
cancel journals? Statistics that help. Library
Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 26, 259–281.
- Ephraim, P. E. (1994). A review of qualitative and
quantitative measures in collection analysis. Electronic Library, 237-242.
- Evans, G. E. (1995). Developing library and information
center collections (3rd ed.).
Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.
- Evans, G. E. (2005). Developing library and information center
collections. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited
- Fang, C. (2005). Statistical evaluation of university libraries in China. Vine, 35(4), 221-229.
- Ford, G.
(1991). Acquisitions : books.
Line, M. B. (Ed.), Academic Library
Management . Chicago: American Library Association.
- Foudy, G., y McManus, A. (2005). Using a Decision Grid
Process to Build Consensus in Electronic Resources Cancellation Decisions. The
Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(6), 533–538.
- Fuchs, B. E. et al. (2006). Behavioral Citation Analysis:
Toward Collection Enhancement for Users. College and Research Libraries, 67(4),
304-324.
- Fuentes Romero, J. J. (1999). Evaluación de bibliotecas y
centros de información. Gijón: Ediciones Trea.
- Fuentes Romero, J. J. (2010). La colección de materiales en las bibliotecas. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
- Fussler, H. H., y Simon, J. L. (1961). Patters in
the use of books in large research libraries. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
|
