Herramientas Personales
Usted está aquí: Inicio → V - Bibliografía → R - Z
Creative Commons
 

R - Z

 

  • Ranganathan, S. R. (1931 ). The Five Laws of Library and Information Services. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.

 

  • Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1983). Quantitative methods for library and information science. New York: Halstead.

 

  • Rea, J. W. (1998). A Core Collection Strategy for Protecting Undergraduate Education at a Comprehensive University. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, March,  145-150.

 

  • Regos Varela, X. A. (1999). Programa de gestión y desarrollo de colecciones en una biblioteca universitaria (I): Aportaciones a su definición y metodología. En Boletín de la Asociación Andaluza de Bibliotecarios, 57. Disponible en: http://eprints.rclis.org/3228/1/baaab57a4.pdf [Consulta: 26/03/2009].

 

  • Regos Varela, X. A. (2000). Programa de gestión y desarrollo de colecciones en una biblioteca universitaria (II): Políticas de gestión de colecciones. Boletín De La Asociación Andaluza De Bibliotecarios, 58.  Disponible en: http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/3222/1/baaab58a3.pdf [Consulta: 26/03/2009].

 

  • Rehman, S. U., y Bashir, S. (1993). Comparative Measurement of Book Availability in Academic Libraries. International Information & Library Review , 25, 183-193.

 

  • Rementería, P. A. (2002). El sistema bibliotecario universitario chileno y el acceso a la información: Las Bibliotecas del Consejo de Rectores de las Universidades Chilenas en la Sociedad de la Información. Santiago de Chile: CABID.

 

  • Research Libraries Group. (1981). RLG collection development manual (2nd. ed.). Stanford, Cal.: Research Libraries Group.

 

  • Rivero M. J., y Nieves Ponce, M. Evaluación de colecciones mediante el análisis de estadísticas de uso.
  • Rodger, E.M. (1987). The evaluation of library and information services in times of economic restraint: The university view. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 39(11-12), 349-354.

 

  • Samson, S. et al. (2004). Networked Resources, Assessment and Collection Development. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(6), 476-481.

 

  • Sandison, A. (1974). Density of use, and absence of obsolescence in physics journals at MIT. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 25,3, 172-182.

 

  • Sanz Casado, E. (1994). Manual de estudios de usuarios. Madrid: Fundación Germán Sanchez Ruiperéz.

 

  • Sanz Casado, E., y Martín Moreno, C. (1997). Técnicas bibliométricas aplicadas a los estudios de usuarios. Revista General De Información y Documentación, 7(2), 41-68.

 

  • Sanz Casado, E., y Martín Moreno, C. (1998). Aplicación de técnicas bibliométricas a la gestión bibliotecaria. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 12(24), 24-40.

 

  • Sargent, S. H. (1979). The uses and limitations of Trueswell. College and Research Libraries, 40, 416-423.

 

  • Satoh, Y., Nagata, H., Kytömäki, P., y Gerrard, S. (2005). Evaluation of the university library service quality: Analysis through focus group interviews. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 6(3), 183-193.

 

  • Schmidt, K. A. (1999). Understanding the business of library acquisitions. Chicago, London: American Library Association.

 

  • Selth, J. et al. (1992). The use of books within the library. College and Research Libraries, 53, 197-205.

 

  • Setien Quesada, E. (1998 ). Modelación matemática de bibliotecas en desarrollo. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 12(24), 41-48.

 

  • Shiue, Y. C., y Guo, G. M. (2005). A method to build core article ranked lists in interdisciplinary department and journal.  Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences,  313-328.

 

  • Shaw, W. M., Jr. (1978). A practical journal usage technique. College and Research Libraries, 39, 479-484.

 

  • Shreeves, E. (1997). Is there a future for cooperative collection development in the digital age? (Resource Sharing in a Changing Environment). Library Trends, 45(3), 373- .

 

  • Silverstein, C. (1996). Predicting invididual book use for off-site storage using decision trees. Library Quarterly, 63(3), 266-293.

 

  • Sowole, I. A. (1995). Collection Development at the University of Agriculture Library, Abeokuta, (UNAAB) Nigeria. International Information & Library Review, 27, 383-391.

 

  • Spencer, J. S., y Millson-Martula, C. (2006). Serials cancellations in college and small university libraries: The national scene. Serials Librarian, 49(4), 135-151.

 

  • Sylvia, M. J. (1998). Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal collection evaluation using psychology student research bibliographies. Collection Building, 17(1), 20-28.

 

 

  • Thornton, G. A. (2004). Impact of Electronic Resources on Collection Development, the Roles of Librarians, and Library Consortia. Library Trends, 48(4), 842-856.

 

  • Titus, E. M. (1994). Barcoding as a tool for collection use analysis : A pilot proyect.  Information Technology and Libraries, 13, 257-265.

 

  • Trueswell, R. W. (1965). A quantitative measure of user circulation requirements and its possible effect on stack thinning and multiple copy determination. American Documentation, 16, 20-25.

 

  • Trueswell, R. W. (1966). Determining the optimal number for volumes for a library’s core collection. Libri, 16, 49-60.

 

  • Trueswell, R. W. (1969). User circulation satisfaction vs. size of holdings at three academic libraries. C&RL, 30, 204-213.

 

  • Urs, S. R., y Dominic, J. (1999). Quality in collection management: measuring book availability performance of academic libraries. DRTC Workshop on Information Management.

 

  • Van House, N. A. (1990). Measuring academic library performance : a practical approach. Chicago: American Library Association.

 

  • Van House, N. A., Lynch, M. J., McClure, Ch. R., Zweizig, D. L., Rodger, E. J. (1985). Output measures for public libraries: a manual of standardized procedures (2nd ed.). Chicago: ALA.

 

  • Vara Lakshmi, R. S. R. (2003). Measurement of College Library Performance: An Evaluative Study with Standards. International Information & Library Review, 35, 19-37.

 

  • Ward, S. M. et al. (2003). Collection development based on patron requests: collaboration between interlibrary loan and acquisitions. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 27, 203-213.

 

  • Weaver, P. (1999). A Student-Centered, Classroom-Based Approach to Collection Building. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(3), 202-210.

 

  • Wenger, C.B. et al. (1979). Monograph evaluation for acquisitions in large research library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,
    30, 88-92.

 

  • Weimers, E. Jr. (1984). Collection evaluation: a practical guide to the literature. Library Acquisitions; Theory and Practice, 8, 65-76.

 

  • Weitzel, S. R. (2006). Elaboração de uma política de desenvolvimento de coleções em bibliotecas universitárias. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência.

 

  • White, H. (1995). Brief tests for collection evaluation Strength: A Methodology for All Types of Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

 

  • Whitmire, E. (2002). Academic library performance measures and undergraduates' library use and educational outcomes. Library and Information Science Research, 24(2), 107-128.

 

  • Winkworth, I. (1991). Stock management and disposal : Collection building and demolition. M. B. Line (ed.), Academic Library Management . Chicago: American Library Association.

 

  • Wyllys, R. E. (1978). On the Analysis of Growth Rates of Library Collections and Expenditures. Collection Management, 2(2), 115-128.

 

  • Yarman, D. L. (2004). Collection overlap analysis: sharing more. Tesis doctoral, A Master's Research Paper submitted to the Kent State University School of Library and Information Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Library and Information Science.

 

  • Youngen, G. K. (1999). Using current awareness search results to measure a journal collection's relevancy. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 23(2), 141-148.

 

  • Zipf, G. K. (1935). The Psychobiology of Language. Houghton-Mifflin.

 

  • Zipp, L.S. (1996). Thesis and Dissertation Citations as Indicators of Faculty Research Use of University Library Journal Collections. Library Resources and Technical Services, 40(4), 335-342.
Acciones de Documento